The latest Gordon Roy Parker lawsuit for beginners and Judge Joyner
Anonymous Remailer 25 April 2008 09:25:12
Gordon Roy Parker, renowned netloon and usenet-kook, filed a new suit 6 weeks ago-- http://www.cybersheet.com/chess/parker-v-sloan.html Like with every single one of Parker's numerous earlier frivolous suits ("how to misconstrue RICO in seventeen different ways), failure on each and every count therein is guaranteed.
Here's a summary of the suit for Judge Joyner and other beginners, to facilitate a quick dismisal of fr00t l00p's bleatings. A more formal version of this, with a few words changed to appropriate legalese, has been sent via the snailmail to the court.
Gordon Roy Parker, a suspected drexual herverp and weviant (you must consult the documents appended to this printed summary), who has a long, well-documented history of online harassment and abuse of minors and whose self-claimed specialization is "Seduction", has repeatedly published in usenet groups devoted to chess the most vicious type of attacks against famous female chessplayers, including an ex world- champion whom he called a C--t. The victims are people who have never met or had any dealings whatsoever with Parker prior to the present actiom. They are victims of his cyberstalking, possibly selected at random or for reasons which should be left to qualified medical and psychiatric personnel to analyze.
The above is factual and far from being denied by Parker has been openly admitted by him (see the appendix) and repeated by him. Despite his attempts at spoilation of evidence, it is all there.
Allegedly, Parker finally succeeded in provoking the husband of this ex world-champion to retaliate by parodying Parker's usenet posts. At no stage was such a post made using anything but a pseudonym which Parker may also have used previously. The pseudonym is Ray Gordon, which has at no stage been or been similar to Parker's legal name.
Such satirical posts as may have been made were, by any objective standards (you must consult the appendix to this summary) far less offensive than the "real thing", as authored by Parker himself.
It is conceded that an attorney would not have recommended this form of retaliation to the husband of Parker's famous victim. However, the normal legal remedy of suing Parker for libel would be unwise, as it is a fact that Parker's assets are insufficient even to fund him having the defendant's in the present meritless lawsuit served. Parker's last job was as a secretary, from which position he was long ago removed.
An ironic twist to the present lawsuit is that Parker was turned down for a job at the US Chess Federation on the grounds of the abusive postings that he has admitted to making and which are nothing to do with any alleged imposter (imposter of a fake name, that is).
The decision for Judge Joyner is, in essence, very simple. Setting to one side, just for the time being, either issue a licence to every welfare bum to throw stones for years at the houses of upstanding citizens but then penalize the citizen for less-than-proportionate defense, or not. Now it is understood what must be decided, just fit the legal arguments around what justice demands as an outcome.
Thanks for your attention. You will know what to do. The real question is, of course, not how to dispose of fr00t l00p's latest dripping, but it is how to use the law to ensure that fr00t l00p is taught a very, very hard lesson, so that he never again abuses our legal process which he tries to use as a tool for extortion and harassment.
It is unfortunate that tortious castration is no longer a remedy that is available to judges. Parker's nonsensical filings would be even more amusing if they had to be delivered by voice and in soprano. High-pitched as Parker already sounds (I'm sure he blames the phone company), upped a few demi-quavers he would be worthy of a P.T.Barnum special show.
After finally wading through all 79 pages of convoluted, conspirational nonsense (I am not even going to attempt the appendices), I came to my layman's conclusion that Ray is about to go 0-20. What I find ironic is that if the accusations of someone faking Ray's identity are true, Ray actually might have had a case. If Ray had kept this case simple and just gone after Troung, he might have had a chance for some small settlement. By throwing in all the other nonsense, he made the case too complex. As usual, in making the case too complex he failed to properly state a cause for relief.
If the courts agree with me, that will again prove Ray really is an idiot.
